Blog Single

Hold on—this is the real, tactical playbook you can use if your sportsbook or exchange team is serious about entering Asian markets. The opening here gives the immediate value: a concise checklist of regulatory, technical and commercial steps you can action in the first 90 days. Read this and you’ll leave with a plan rather than a theoretical brief, which is what follows next.

Here’s the short benefit: identify the single-country priority, validate the product-market fit with a pilot market, and secure payments and licensing groundwork before any heavy engineering starts. That three-step approach keeps costs predictable and reduces regulatory exposure, and I’ll unpack why each step matters as we go.

Observation: Why Asia is different—and why that matters

Wow! Asia is not a single market; it is dozens of distinct regulatory regimes, cultural betting behaviours, and payment rails that refuse to be shoehorned into one playbook. Consumer preferences vary from micro-betting on cricket events in India to lottery-and-soccer-focused markets across Southeast Asia, so a one-size product rarely sticks. The next section will show how to segment markets practically so you can pick the right first target.

Picking the right pilot market

Start with three filters: regulatory clarity, payment accessibility, and market appetite for exchange-style products. Use those filters to rank candidate countries—pick the top one as your pilot. For example, markets with clear online gaming statutes but limited local exchanges are prime targets because they combine legal pathing and unmet demand. Next, we’ll quantify the screening metrics you should use to score candidates.

Practical scoring: assign 0–5 for each filter (Regulation, Payments, Demand) and add a fourth operational cost metric; a pilot with a composite score ≥12 (out of 20) is usually viable. That scoring method keeps the decision objective and defensible to senior stakeholders, and the following section explains what regulatory items to confirm before you proceed.

Regulatory checklist and KYC/AML essentials

Hold on—regulation can stop you cold, so this is where you must be operationally conservative. Confirm licensing pathways, permitted bet types, advertising restrictions, and whether local servers or local entity requirements apply. Also check whether exchange models are explicitly allowed or only fixed-odds operations are licensed. The next paragraph lists the KYC/AML steps to hard-code into your pilot.

Minimum KYC/AML items: identity verification (government ID), proof of address, transaction monitoring rules, threshold-based enhanced due diligence, and clear record retention policies aligned with local law. These controls protect your business and make payment partners comfortable; below I outline payments and reconciliation concerns that are often overlooked.

Payments, reconciliation and settlement design

Payment rails differ wildly: in-market e-wallets dominate Southeast Asia, bank transfers and UPI-style systems dominate India, and cards are still material in some APAC corridors. Design your architecture so the settlement layer can map multiple in-country rails to a single ledger model to avoid reconciliation headaches. Next, I’ll suggest an architecture pattern that balances speed and compliance.

Design pattern: use a multi-rail payments adapter that normalises incoming funds to an internal settlement currency, with a central ledger for user balances, and a reconciliation microservice that emits daily statements. That approach isolates risk and keeps payouts auditable—details that regulators and banking partners will ask for during onboarding, which I discuss next when it comes to local partners and licensing strategies.

Market entry approaches (comparison)

There are three practical entry approaches: greenfield build (own platform), local partnership (white-label or joint venture), and B2B integration (use a licensed operator’s exchange via API). Each has trade-offs in time-to-market, control, and capex requirements, and below is a compact comparison table to make the choice visible.

Use this comparison to choose a route that matches your risk appetite and balance sheet, and in the next paragraph I’ll explain which commercial KPIs to measure during the pilot phase so you can make go/no-go decisions objectively.

Pilot KPIs and performance metrics

On the one hand, top-line GGR matters; on the other, product-market fit is proven by retention and liquidity metrics that exchange models need. Track these KPIs daily during pilot: matched volume, spread between back/lay, active liquidity providers, take rate, new registrations per marketing dollar, deposit-to-bet conversion, and 30-day retention. The next section gives concrete targets for a 90-day pilot to help investors and ops agree on success criteria.

Concrete 90-day pilot targets: achieve matched volume sufficient to show market depth (e.g., target daily matched volume equal to 1–2× your projected first-year APAC daily run-rate), 25% deposit-to-bet conversion within first 7 days, and 10% 30-day retention. Hit those and you can justify scaling; if not, the “why” analysis follows and should drive changes to liquidity, price, or UX.

Product and UX adjustments for Asian users

Small UI changes can move adoption. For example, add quick-access markets for popular local sports, local-language support, smaller minimum stakes, and alternative settlement options (voucher top-ups, POS cash-ins in some regions). Also include clear local help channels and simple dispute resolution flows. Next, we’ll cover how you should approach liquidity provision and market-making for a new exchange market.

Liquidity plan: seed markets with internal market-makers and incentivise early external LPs with reduced fees or rebates; run maker-taker pricing models until organic liquidity grows. This keeps spreads tight and user experience acceptable while you scale, and the following paragraphs address legal partnership structures and commercial terms you should consider.

Choosing partners and drafting commercial terms

When you pick a partner, insist on explicit clauses around data ownership, customer transfers, revenue splits, and termination. Protect yourself with milestones to reduce stranded costs if the market underperforms. The next paragraph outlines a negotiation checklist you should use with counsels and commercial teams.

Negotiation checklist: IP ownership, NDA duration, minimum performance guarantees, compliance ownership, and payment handling responsibilities. Include an audit clause allowing periodic reviews of KYC/AML and transaction logs. With partners covered, the next section talks about technical architecture and scaling considerations for exchanges in Asia.

Technical architecture, latency and localization

Latency matters most for micro-betting and live markets; colocate critical matching engines near primary users when latency sensitivity is high. Use regionally distributed caches for market data and a central clearing ledger for settlement, and design for isolated region failover. The following section covers risk, limits, and fraud controls you should bake into the platform from day one.

Operational risk controls: daily risk limits, per-account exposure caps, automated anomaly detection for matched volume spikes, and mandatory cooling-off periods for suspicious activity. These controls reduce regulatory headaches and protect your liquidity providers; next we’ll share two short case examples showing what can go right and wrong in a pilot.

Mini-case 1: Fast success via B2B integration

Example: a mid-sized exchange used API integration with a licensed local operator in Southeast Asia and launched in 90 days; because payment rails were already established and KYC was handled by the partner, they reached break-even within 6 months. This example highlights how partnerships can shortcut regulatory and payment complexity, and the next case shows the downside of ignoring local cultural product fit.

Mini-case 2: Lessons from a misfit product

Example: a greenfield exchange that shipped the same UI it used in Europe found low retention because minimum staking amounts were too high for local users and popular sports weren’t featured; they had to pause and relaunch with localized stake sizes, costing three months and significant rework. Use that lesson to validate product-market fit before scaling, and then consult the quick checklist below.

Quick Checklist (90-day pilot)

Here’s a compact, actionable checklist you can use immediately to run a controlled pilot that limits downside and produces measurable learning.

• Regulatory sign-off: confirm permitted bet types and entity needs within 30 days; this avoids hard stops.
• Payments: test 3 in-market rails and one fallback international rail in sandbox; reconcile daily.
• Liquidity: seed with internal market-makers and recruit 3 external LPs before public launch.
• Compliance: deploy KYC flow and set threshold-based EDD rules.
• Metrics: instrument matched volume, take rate, conversion, and 30/90-day retention.

Run this checklist in sprint cycles and use the learnings to decide scale vs. pivot, which I’ll expand on in the next part where I recommend strategic resources and a platform you may want to review for design inspiration.

Recommended reference for platform flow and UX

For product teams designing flows and dashboards, review existing operator patterns for betting and exchange UX carefully to avoid reinventing the wheel and to ensure regulatory compliance; a practical starting point is to review established operator pages for layout and disclosure standards. For example, engineers and product managers often compare their flows against known regional operators to reduce design risk and align with user expectations. One accessible reference for inspiration and layout discipline is the pointsbet official site which illustrates clear market navigation and responsible gaming disclosures in a way you can adapt for local pilots without copying their legal or commercial content.

That reference can help your team visualise how markets, odds displays, and responsible gaming tools are laid out for end users, and the next section explains common mistakes I see teams make when expanding into Asia so you can avoid them upfront.

Common mistakes and how to avoid them

• Assuming one UX fits all: avoid this by user-testing local samples and adjusting stake sizes and market priorities.
• Underestimating payments complexity: mitigate by integrating local PSPs early and performing live settlement tests.
• Skip-the-license approach: don’t try to rely on grey areas—engage local counsel and secure compliance opinions.
• Poor liquidity planning: seed markets and incentivise makers rather than expecting organic depth.
• Ignoring marketing localisation: translate promos, but localise content tone and payment promos.

Fix those errors early and you’ll save months and meaningful capex, and next I answer the questions I most often hear from product leaders in quick FAQ form.

One final, practical point: as you document your pilot and approach, keep a repository of decisions, financial assumptions, and dialogue with regulators and PSPs; that audit trail is invaluable should questions arise later and is something I’ll mention to investors when you present your case.

Also, for teams seeking product layout and responsible gaming language examples during UX design workshops, consult the platform patterns on the pointsbet official site to see how operator pages present disclosures and market selection without needing to recreate their commercial offers.

18+ only. Gambling involves risk and can lead to loss; implement sensible bankroll controls, set customer limits, and link to local help services where required by law. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, contact local support services immediately.